Deborah Dolen's Lawsuit Scam:

How and Why Deborah R. Dolen aka "Author" Mabel White Targeted My Family Pro se In a Lawsuit Scam, and the Ugly Truth About Her Frivolous, Malicious, and Vexatious Abuse of Process.
by Joanne Kidd, Jacksonville

Jump to The Federal Court's Final Rulings and DISMISSAL of her nonsensical claims against us.
Jump to The Federal Court's FINAL Judgment FOR Defendants and AGAINST Deborah Dolen.

Our courts are intended to be used for actual victims seeking justice, not for greedy individuals seeking riches by playing "lawsuit lottery" with false victimization claims and stalking through the courts.

We’d never heard of this individual before she barged into our lives with her vexatious extortion lawsuit scam, but it didn’t take long to realize that we were dealing with the Queen of Crazyville--and before long we were to encounter a few of her village idiots.

Deborah R. Dolen claims she was a victim of cyberbullying. She has also claimed she was a victim of "stalking" and that she is a new advocate against it. She has promoted many false nonsensical victimization claims, but they were all part of her plan to game the legal system (pro se) while disparaging, libeling, and labeling us as her "defendants," and her "tormentors." Why? Simply to try and force us into to paying her to stop because we had become her latest scam endeavor. She openly held over our heads that she would ruin our reputations with her lies and continue with her nonsensical pro se lawsuit against us if we did not pay her to go away. We stood our ground and refused to be extorted or affected by this woman and her maliciousness--because as with any lawsuit, there comes a time when the plaintiff has to "put up or shut up."

In the end, Deborah Dolen could not and did not provide a scintilla of evidence to substantiate ANY of her outrageous claims. The only evidence she provided was that it was her own conduct that fell under the definition of being a stalker, cyberpath, and a bully, and in reality - just like a textbook case of false victimization, everything she falsely claimed we were doing to her was exactly what she was doing to us. Here's the ugly truth about her bullying, her game of pro se lawsuit lottery, her fictional claims, her delusions, her lies, and her motive.

January 2009:
In late 2008, on a Topix forum where Deborah Dolen had been boasting and self proclaiming herself to be a "famous author," forum participants Googled her name and discovered her criminal history. They then outted her on that forum as being a former prostitute and convicted felon. They posted links to newspaper articles written about her, and from there, things apparently got ugly because Dolen began denying her documented history. One of these posters, (Arden_1) had an IP location as being in the same [very large] city where my family and I live. At some point in time, Deborah Dolen and my husband's disturbed ex  Angela Schubart Ledcke had made contact and become friends. Probably because they had both been featured on a website about scammers. The revenge-seeking ex convinced Dolen that my mother, my husband, and I were these Topix posters, and she provided Dolen with our names and personal information. She baited and manipulated Dolen into doing some dirty work of *revenge for her by telling Deborah Dolen that we had lots of money.

Prior to us even knowing that Deborah Dolen existed, but after Dolen had briefly researched (stalked) us and our assets (as she has admitted doing ), she and Ledcke devised a plan to have my husband and me named in a bogus lawsuit--simply to try and harass us and force us into a monetary settlement. For an added act of malice, Angela Ledcke also provided Dolen with my elderly mother's name, and she was included in the lawsuit. According to later statements by Angela Schubart Ledcke (my husband's ex, and Dolen's partner in this endeavor), Dolen promised Ledcke that she would do her dirty work and "get them" (us) for her. *Ledcke had lost custody of a 17 1/2 year old daughter to my husband a few years prior and was denied any visitation (which clearly speaks for itself). She had been obsessed with trying to get even with us and constantly trying to interject herself into our lives and cause problems. This endeavor must've seemed perfect for her ultimate revenge.

Wonder what was going on?  Okay, I’ll tell you in a little more detail….
In this time of a down-turned economy, many businesses are suffering. Sales are down, people aren't spending like they had been, and small businesses are taking a hit--especially home-based businesses, I would imagine. One home-based business owner was attempting a new way to supplement her income. It seems she decided to sue unsuspecting people and play a pro se lawsuit lottery game within our legal system. To most, this type of lawsuit abuse would not be an option. To one individual who had vast experience in the court because of her own experiences and felony record, the plan was to pick our pockets through the Federal court by gaming the system and filing an unfounded pro se lawsuit while simultaneously filing for bankruptcy and naming us as creditors. 

In mid January of 2009, convicted felon / paralegal / pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen called my [then] 84 year-old mother on the phone. She introduced herself and began to explain to my mother how people were picking on her in an online forum and calling her ugly names. She went on to say how she was a famous author (Mabel White) and how she didn't deserve that. My mother had no clue who this woman was or what she was talking about, so when Dolen began to ask my mother personal questions, my mother told her that she did not know who she was and that she was not interested. At this point Deborah Dolen began a verbal assault and threatened my 85 year old mother by telling her that she had "better be interested" because she was going to be "sued in Federal Court, lose everything she owned, and be thrown out in the streets."

Soon thereafter, Deborah R. Dolen aka Mabel White did file a baseless Federal Lawsuit against my mother, my husband and me. Her complaint and "Federal lawsuit" was nothing more than an narration, deficient of any support, that was based solely on her own delusions. In fact, despite the fact that my mother had no internet access, computer, means or ability to use the internet, this bogus and fantasy lawsuit named my elderly mother as a "Jane Doe Cyberstalker" and accused her of cyberstalking, internet fraud, conspiracy, and even trademark infringement. For shock value and leverage for what would become a continued attempt at extorting money from us, Dolen was demanding a five year prison sentence for all of us - including my elderly mother! (Being pro se, Dolen obviously did not know that she couldn't make criminal claims against us.) In this game of lawsuit lottery, Dolen named all of us as "known cyberstalkers" and was demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages - falsely identifying us as the posters on Topix and making all sort of bizarre and irrational claims against us. After filing her Federal lawsuit, her first demand for money was immediate, and she said that if we paid her $10,000 she would drop the lawsuit against us. We refused.

Although we had never heard of her or her "author" alias of Mabel White prior to being targeted and harassed by her, and although plaintiff / debtor, Deborah R. Dolen admitted that she has had no prior business or other dealings with any of us, obviously thinking she was being cunning, after filing a nonsensical pro se lawsuit against us where she was demanding close to a million dollars in damages, and prior to having us served, Dolen filed for bankruptcy (writing off close to a million dollars in unsecured bad debt) and listed each of us individually as creditors (for the amount of $1.00). Then, after she filed for bankruptcy, she served us with the Federal complaint.  Why?  Because, as she boasted, she thought she could sue us and we could not file an answer or counter-sue her for her devious actions against us because she would be under the "protection" of the bankruptcy court. If we (the defendants) didn't answer the lawsuit because of being named creditors, the plaintiff could potentially receive a default judgment. If we, the defendants, did answer the Federal complaint, her attempted intent was to slap sanctions on us in bankruptcy court. Two courts - same game. (Sort of ups the odds in the lawsuit lottery game.) At one point she tried to bargain with us, and said she would not file for sanctions against us IF we would pay her a few thousand dollars. (She has actually made many demands of monetary "solutions" for dismissing us from her bogus lawsuit against us.) Her monetary demands ranged from $2,000 each to $10,000, and ended up escalating to claimed "damages" of $7,000,000.

This was a person, who from her own bankruptcy affidavit, swore under penalty of perjury in Bankruptcy court that she only made on the average $11,000 a year in income from her claimed "fame" for the prior three consecutive years. This filing reflected that her annual income actually increased from $10,000 to $13,000, and yet at the same time she was swearing (under penalty of perjury) in her complaint against us in Federal Court that we caused her over $75,000 in lost income from the past year. (That amount of a $75,000 loss is the ticket to be able to file a complaint in "Federal" court.) A bold lie from Dolen? Absolutely! She banks on the court's right hand never knowing what the left hand is doing! (And surprisingly, they don't!) She is confident that she can exploit the flaws in our system. (And she did!)

We answered with counterclaims, and Dolen immediately threatened to have us sanctioned, claiming that she was under the protection of her Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Eventually, the bankruptcy Judge informed her that from the date she filed her bankruptcy she was not protected from her actions against us, but would be liable for those actions. After reading the case, he further cautioned her in proceeding with her claims against us, and clearly stated that the purpose of his court was not to "protect" her from her actions or the liability resulting from them. What did debtor Dolen hear him say?  Somehow, she interpreted and boasted in many delusional statements and additional filings that 'she won, we lost’ and that the Judge had "barred" our counterclaims. Go figure!

Deborah Dolen went on to make her claims against us public. She posted false and libelous commentary about us on websites, in forums, and self-published press releases. She has named us individually as "known cyberstalkers" and claimed we wanted to obtain notoriety and some sort of "power" by associating ourselves with her self-proclaimed "famous author" name of Mabel White. She fabricated claims that we had other victims and had "stalked" her. She fabricated claims that we had committed all sorts of internet fraud, trademark infringement, criminal acts against her - and more. At one point, she even published online a self-written and fake court order against us. Every claim, every allegation, and in fact, the entire "Federal lawsuit" was based solely on false pretenses, and was a wild display of grandiose and persecutory delusions, reckless irresponsibility, intentional lies, and a vexatious attempt to libel and disparage us, then demand money from us to stop.

So, why did Deborah Dolen target us for her lawsuit?
From what I have learned about and read from this plaintiff since January of 2009, I think this came about because of some sort of grandiose/hero complex she may have. According to my husband's ex,
Angela Schubart Ledcke, as mentioned previously, Dolen had contacted and befriended her because they were both featured on the same online scammer site. Ledcke dangled my family like a carrot in front of someone who was greedy enough to forget logic and reasoning, and set her sights in rolling the dice and playing a game of pro se lawsuit lottery. There was no other way on earth for Deborah Dolen to know who we were, know our names, emails, and/or our personal information without the rants of her new friend and my husband’s longtime bothersome ex, Angela Schubart Ledcke. Although Ledcke eventually confessed to supplying this pro se plaintiff with our names, Dolen's original claim was that our attorney had “dimed us out” and supplied her with our names and information. The only little logistical problem with that was that Dolen and Ledcke were trashing us on an that Topix forum days prior to us knowing anything about Dolen and even before our attorney knew who we were. 

Deborah Dolen's bullying wasn't exclusive to us. She threatened our attorney with a bar complaint if he did not do what she demanded! She took it to the next level and actually filed a delusion and fantasy-filled Texas Bar Complaint against him, stating under oath that he was the one who initiated her claims against us by prodding her to sue us. Her next step was to post her "testimony" and this bar complaint on the same website as the fake court order against us, and then trash-talk, lie about, and libel our attorney continuously in public forums - eventually to the point to where our attorney was forced to file his own Complaint Against Deborah Dolen for torts, injury, assault, libel, and slander. 

More about this pro se plaintiff:
Although it has been defined as "stalking" by this deluded plaintiff, I discovered while trying to figure out just who this deranged-acting nut was who had targeted and was suing, harassing, threatening and disparaging my family, that Deborah R. Dolen (aka Deborah Ruth Harvey, Deborah R. Graves, Deborah R. Avramidis, Deborah Ruth Avamidis), has an extensive arrest, criminal, and felony record!  According to her
FDLE Report and court records in various Florida counties, she has been arrested for everything from prostitution procurement, solicitation of arson, pandering, forgery, credit card factoring, probation violation, Rico violations, money laundering, racketeering and grand theft, and much more. Deborah Dolen was one of several defendants in a consumer fraud action filed by the Federal Trade Commission, and the FTC named her as one of the Top 10 "Dot Con" scams ( more info). As Deborah Harvey, she was once even captured as a fugitive, tried and convicted of racketeering in a children’s Spina Bifida charity scam, and sentenced to a seven year prison term. It appears that while In prison, this pro se plaintiff obtained a paralegal certificate (via correspondence classes) and this may be where her illusions of being an actual attorney began.  (I think this may also be where she learned and practiced the language she uses to attempt to intimidate others with her threats and legal-bully-talk, which I personally refer to as monkey-mouth-cell-gangster talk.  This pro se litigant, as Deborah R. Harvey, had once been previously determined incompetent to represent herself pro se in Florida court during an appeals trial after being found guilty of felony charges.

In one instance, I discovered that she had tried this bullying 'I’m going to sue you' tactic before by claiming she had the exclusive trademark for the term "soy wax." In that instance, she went so far as to pretend in a letter to be “legal counsel” (as D. R. Dolen) for Mabel White and another inexistent "partner" (aka alias) in order to threaten and intimidate candle makers. She claimed she would haul "violators"  into Federal Court in Tampa if they used the term "soywax," but she offered to sell them permission to use the term. Now THAT, in my opinion, is just not normal! Anyway, being a convicted felon, no wonder she changed her name to Mabel White.  Sounds pure and clean, doesn’t it? 

It seems that even "Mabel White" could not live up to honest standards, and although Dolen claims the name to be “good,” Mabel White Home Living has received numerous complaints over the years through the Better Business Bureau and has been the subject of several online scammer sites, reports, and consumer forums, and the defendant in at least one small claims lawsuit from Fed Ex. These complaints and concerns date back throughout the past half a dozen years, but Dolen has now claimed that even the complaints that are from 2002 through 2007 for Mabel White Home Living (MWHL) have come from me and my family--regardless of the basic fact that we would have had no motive, had no prior business dealings with her, and didn’t even know (or care) that she existed until January of 2009 when she began to harass us! Dolen, AS "Mabel White" has even posted rebuttals to many of these aged complaints against her business of Mabel White Home Living, and although they are years old she has publicly named and accused my husband, my 85-year-old mother (who doesn’t own or know how to use a computer), and me for submitting them.  On the site RipOffReport.com, only moments after she emailed our attorney stating that whatever is posted on that site never comes down, as a rebuttal to a complaint from 2007, using her "trade name" of "Mabel White," Dolen posted all of our names along with her delusional accusations about us. 

Of course it’s just my opinion, but I would never do business with someone who demonstrates such unprofessional, unbalanced, and disturbing behavior. But then again, I have no interest in homemade lotions, potions, perfumes, candy or coffee flavor oils - and would never purchased from a business that was not licensed, reputable, and/or have FDA approval on their products. After all, these bathroom-chemist type businesses can too easily substitute canola oil as cheap fillers for essential oils, for example.

Why am I being so tacky and blogging about this?
No, it isn’t like me, but because my family and I have been inconvenienced for the past several years by having our names associated with this convicted felon, I am personally sick of Deborah Dolen's lies, threats, dogmatic delusional pro se legal attacks, constant attempts to libel and disparage us, and demands of money from us. In my opinion, this woman has obviously caused her own problems because of the poor and dishonest choices she has made and continues to make in life, and neither I nor any member of my family has had anything to do with her, her history, her problems, her scams, or anything else she may dream up, claim, and sue us for.  As “famous” as she may think she is, she was (as is) inconsequential to us, as we had never even heard of her or her claimed trade name of “Mabel White” (an alias name she has used freely and directly to libel and harass us) prior to her unwarranted attack on us.

What is a clear and undisputable fact in our world is that this plaintiff, prior to anyone in my family having any idea that she existed, was conspiring against us, researching our assets, posting libelous content about us online, and had already gathered our names, address, phone numbers, personal emails, work emails, and other personal information, and yet her claim is that we had been "stalking" her!  Deborah Dolen has since continued to harass my family by publishing our names and address online, posting distasteful and delusional online comments and outbursts, complete lies, libel, libel per se, and has even published a self-authored fake and unsigned court order against us. Again, go figure.

I am confident that plaintiff "Deborah R. Dolen aka author Mabel White" must realize that her fictional claims against us have no merit whatsoever and were solely based from the unsupported claims and gossip of her only source, my husband's ex, Angela Ledcke (who has personally published online that she is a diagnosed schizophrenic).  Whatever delusional entitlement this person may think she has to be able to pick someone out of thin air to sue, trash, and harass, and attempt to extort money from, she needs to face reality and realize that she made a poor decision when she attacked my family with her lawsuit lottery game. She doesn’t know any of us well enough to comment on anything about us, and I daresay if she did, she would be surprised to discover just who she choose to target. As well, she certainly doesn’t know us well enough to lecture us on any of the many matters she has harassed us with in her numerous emails - some of which she actually sent via our employer's emails.  Nonetheless, she has continued in her libel campaign and empty, unsupported, and ridiculous accusations regarding my family. 

I am also convinced that pride, arrogance, mean-spirited gaming and greed outweighs her ability to recognize reality and actually admit that she was completely and totally wrong in the fantasy-filled conclusions, assumptions, and allegations she made against my family, and in naming us in her nonsensical Federal lawsuit. 

Follow-up....

July 5, 2010:
Since writing about my experience in the above content on my blog, bogus lawsuit filer/pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen aka author "Mabel White" has motioned the Federal Court in the middle district of Florida for injunctive relief to shut down my entire blog, and she has continued to demand money from us. Although that motion was filled with more lies, complete delusions, and whatever fantasies filled her head at the time of filing, the motion was denied.  After the Court ordered her to amend her Federal complaint, she made a few more attempts at making demands from us, and even though we ignored her, she eventually dropped my family from her newest amended bogus Federal complaint. We stood up to this vexatious lawsuit bully, and with any luck, plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen aka author "Mabel White" will not be able to victimize others with her vexatious pro se litigation games in the future. Aside from the fact that she often portrays herself as one of the "rich and famous," sadly, this person, as we have found through our personal experience, demonstrates a total lack of connection with reality, and in our opinion is nothing more than a bully, a nut, and a delusional wanna-be seeking attention.

October 21, 2010 - Here We Go Again...
I am always shocked that there are people who simply do not recognize the consequences of their own actions. Dolen targeting my family in a vexatious lawsuit based solely on greed in order to try and profit from extortion attempts and also to "get us" for her friend (and my husband's ex), has brought with it the consequence of me starting this blog. Because she brought my name online in order to try and trash and damage me in some way, I felt I had the right to defend my name from her delusional rants. In reality, this blog never would've existed, or at least, she never would've been mentioned. After all, without her bullying, lies, threats, libel, abuse, tirades, and vexatious lawsuit against my family, obviously I would not have known who she was or anything about her! (She's not as "famous" in reality as she seems to be in her own mind.) It's just that simple, yet something this person does not seem to understand this. Instead, she is continuing to blame others for her own actions, and is now throwing a fit in Federal court because I've blogged about our experience of being the target of her bullying and latest scam attempt.

This pro se plaintiff is petitioning the court to amend her lawsuit for the third time to once again add us back into her "Federal complaint" of make-believe allegations - simply to harass us and attempt to restrict me from using her name(s) and saying on my blog what she has done to us. She seems to think that I have no right to use the very names that she, herself has used so freely in her attempts to publicly mock, disparage, bully, cyberbully, cyberstalk, cyber smear, harass, threaten, libel, and sue us in bad faith. As has been her usual pattern, she is adding new coo-coo concocted theories and fantasy allegations to her motion to amend. This time, she is claiming and has submitted an exhibit in the case that someone called "the water filer lady" will sign a "formal declaration" against us because this "water filter lady" person received an email from someone else. I don't even know who the heck this "water filter lady" is, so I can only assume that she is just another nutcase.

In our world, we have never come across someone that could act so outrageously irrational and crazy, but I have to admit, Deborah Dolen, as "Mabel White, CEO" did email us (during the phase of her harassment campaign where she was emailing us threats via our employers) and warn us that she "can DO crazy!" Excerpt from one of her harassing emails to us.

Even after being removed from Dolen's Federal complaint in June of 2010, in her attempt to further harass us, in early 2011 Dolen published several online "articles" that intentionally and falsely stated that we were still defendants in this case and "going to trial" as "cyberstalkers" - while publicly gloating because of having  associated our names with such.

With the exception of one [let's say] "less-than-credible" source, a website owned by June Maxam, NorthCountryGazette.org, all other site owners, after simply reading the irrational and ridiculous article(s), immediately, responsibly, and respectfully removed Dolen's bullying libel game from their online publications. Apparently June Maxam is known for the same sort of nonsensicality and for imagining herself to be a "news" correspondent of some sort. Maxam, ignorantly referencing Dolen's obsolete complaint that the court had previously dismissed and removed us from as defendants, insists that I did "go to trial" as a defendant, and that I am "wrong" in stating that I had not. (Some "reporter" - huh?) (I've discovered that ethics, principles, and rationality all seem to run scarce in the world of felons and fruitcakes.) June Maxam, through her webhost, challenged me to sue, but suing the insolvent seems like a senseless waste of time.

An Extra Helping of Insanity!
I've personally witnessed more insane conduct in this one bogus and vexatious lawsuit filed by pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen than I think I've seen collective from anyone in my lifetime. Maybe that's because by choice, I've never had any association with this type of unscrupulous person before. Some of the tactics this plaintiff has used is beyond what anyone with an ounce of honesty and/or credibility would attempt. Although she omitted my family from her 2nd amended complaint and threatened that if we continued with our counterclaims that she would motion to add us back in, she actually seems to believe that she can simply invent claims against us and act as though we were still included in her bogus lawsuit. In some crazy attempt to try and intimidate me, Dolen listed my ex husband on her new witness list and stated that he would testify against my character. When asked about this, my ex said he had never even heard of Deborah R. Dolen and that he had no intention of making any statement or testimony against me. Somehow, in her own little world, she must've theorized that he would have something negative to say about me. Dolen actually included this delusional theory in one of her pleadings and even intimated that he'd left me in our marriage. As with all of her assumptions and claims, It doesn't seem to matter to her that she has absolutely no idea what she's talking about because she doesn't know anything about us.

Dolen has claimed over the past two years that we have "confused" the Federal court Judge in Texas, which resulted in the orders and decisions made in our favor in this case; that we prejudiced the mediator (and experienced criminal attorney) against her; that we "tampered" with the [imaginary] potential jury pool; that I, personally, "witness tampered," because of my blog; and most recently, that we "tainted" the Federal Court Magistrate Judge in Tampa. (All that, and yet I can't even get the postman to stop walking on my lawn!)

Federal Court Orders and Case Decisions in Dolen v. Ryals, et al:

February 24, 2011 - Deborah Dolen's Lawsuit and ALL Claims Against Us Are Dismissed
For the first day in over two years my family and I are no longer being sued and harassed in Federal court by pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen aka "author" Mabel White in a targeted, nonsensical, and fictitious lawsuit lottery game. The Federal court ruled on the  pleadings and ALL of Deborah Dolen's delusional and bogus claims against my family and me were DISMISSED with prejudice today in our favor and she is now barred from ever making those claims against us again. (Predictably, she somehow thought and immediately boasted in an email to our attorney that this decision was in her favor.) As the Federal Court order stated about claim-thrower Deborah R. Dolen's "tortuous action," "enough is enough."  Order of Dismissal  Our counterclaims were dismissed in that case, but were dismissed without prejudice, allowing us to reassert them in a separate action when and where we choose. There wouldn't be much use for this, however, because Dolen is what the courts commonly refer to as a "insolvent defendant." Simply put, she has nothing.

Deborah Dolen's Lawsuit is DISMISSED at Trial by Federal Judge:
April 21, 2011 - Julie Ryals Receives a Judgment AGAINST Deborah R. Dolen and ALL of Dolen's Claims Are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE!
Deborah Dolen's vexatious and nonsensical lawsuit against Julie Ryals came to trial before the Federal Court in Tampa, Florida, on April 18, 2011. The issues were set before a jury. On the third day of the trial, after Deborah Dolen completed her performance as ringmaster for her own dog and pony show, in response to a verbal motion by Julie Ryals' attorney, the Federal Judge made a decision based on the case presented and immediately dismissed all of Deborah Dolen's claims against Julie Ryals WITH PREJUDICE. (Meaning that Dolen cannot bring those claims again.)

The Federal Judge in Tampa told Dolen that she [quote] did not show even the most minuscule ounce of proof to her claims. Dolen had said in published media interviews she had created by interviewing herself that she would not "fall into the sand trap" of having to provide proof of her unsupported allegations, but would instead bring in her own witnesses to simply testify "the old fashioned way." Because Dolen HAD no proof, but had been bulldozing through this case with only threats, bullying, and bogus accusations, it was no surprise that this desperate plan was actually put into play. Dolen introduced the testimonies of Annette Bartowsheski, and Sheryl Farley (aka Sherry Lynn Farley) of Bradenton, FL - two anonymous and scripted "witnesses" that Dolen brought in off the streets to lie and perjure themselves in Federal Court for her cause. (I have to wonder if they realized while "testifying" under oath and the penalty of perjury, that there is indisputable evidence that rebuts what they were scripted and instructed to say.) In addition to the scripted "testimony" agenda, Annette Bartowsheski seemed to be bothered because I did not publish a negative comment she submitted to my blog, and she pointed this out to the Federal Judge. (Her comment, by the way, was the ONLY negative/ugly comment I have ever received, and it was one that fell into the "irrational" category.) Bartowsheski also, via her affidavit and testimony, stated and complained to the Federal court that my blog was "too long." I suppose I was unaware that this was a Federal Court-worthy issue or offense, but like I said, "irrational."  Sherry Farley was even less rational, and in addition to her testimony being completely off the wall, she told the court that her deceased mother spoke to her (by way of a tree falling on her house), and told her to "help Deborah Dolen."

Despite these witnesses' ridiculous testimonial scripts and transparent attempts to manufacture the necessary evidence by inventing it on the stand (aka perjury), the Federal Judge dismissed such foolery and disciplined Dolen by stating that she had an "infinitesimal-infinity chance of prevailing in this case." (Direct quote) When Dolen uttered a confused "a-wha?" the Federal Judge clarified by saying that Dolen had “a snowball’s chance in Hell of prevailing on ANY claims made against Mrs. Ryals.” (Another direct quote) He further instructed pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen aka Mabel White that she is forbidden from ever bringing any claims she made or could have made against Julie Ryals in this case in the future in ANY court, therefore, dismissing ALL claims against Julie Ryals by Deborah Dolen WITH PREJUDICE! 

Pending was Julie Ryals' counterclaim of cybersquatting for the domain julieryals.com, which Dolen had originally purchased at the onset of this "lawsuit" endeavor to use as a tool for libeling, name-calling, and attempt to extort a cash settlement in the case. Dolen kept this domain for 26 months, until eventually abandoning the domain and letting it expire - at which time julieryals.com was recovered by Julie Ryals. Because this ($12.00) counter claim was at this point moot, it was also dismissed.

The Federal Court's Final Decision in Deborah Dolen's Vexatious Lawsuit:
"
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered AGAINST Deborah R. Dolen and FOR Julie Ryals on ALL Deborah R. Dolen’s claims."
Despite Deborah Dolen's continued delusions of the outcome of her fictional lawsuit, the orders of the court speak for themselves.

Defendants' Motion for Fees Against Deborah Dolen - Re: Plaintiff Dolen's Bad faith litigation

Order GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Fees AGAINST plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen, etc.

Deborah Dolen Attempts to Recuse Federal Magistrate Judge and Fails

Deborah Dolen's Response and Threats via Email
(Including additional excuses. She DID respond, and her response to the Court was a fireworks finale of crazy! The "ditching" any fees awarded to us in 56 months threatened by Dolen in this email was referencing her [calculated] upcoming bankruptcy in 56 months, when she would be eligible to file again. )

Florida Court Finds that Pro se Litigant Deborah Dolen Engaged in Vexatious Conduct
[Vexatious conduct, as defined by the court, is conduct that is an abuse of the judicial process and serves merely to harass or maliciously injure another party to the civil action.]
"...the Plaintiff makes several baseless arguments, cites to inapplicable case law, and most importantly, does not refute the Defendants’ allegations concerning her alleged vexatious litigation tactics. After a review of the procedural history of this case, it is clear that the Plaintiff engaged in vexatious and unreasonable conduct that multiplied the proceedings." (Pages 5 and 6)
[Vexatious conduct, as defined by the court, is conduct that is an abuse of the judicial process and serves merely to harass or maliciously injure another party to the civil action.]

Deborah Dolen Files Affidavit of Indigency to Proceed in Appeals Court 
Even after all of her claims had been dismissed and unproven, Dolen continues to make her same unsupported delusions about us in an application to proceed to the appeals court and have the fees waived. This Affidavit for Indigency included a statement that Dolen owed her witness #2, Sheryl Farley of Bradenton close to $2,000 for "trial expenses." Was this a payment for Farley's manufactured testimony? (When Sheryl Farley wasn't paid this amount Dolen promised, she placed a lien against the title of Deborah Dolen's vehicle.)

The Final Judgment For Fees AGAINST Plaintiff, Deborah R. Dolen March 23, 2012
Although it probably goes without saying, the simple fact that Deborah Dolen remained pro se throughout the history of this extortion attempt case is another indication of how baseless and unfounded her claims were and are. If her claims had held any merit or truth, contingency attorneys would’ve been lined up to jump on the case. Instead, they continued to warn her of her liability in pursuing – as did the various judges involved.

I have to wonder if the plan to "get" us, coaxed by Dolen's abettor, Angela Schubart Ledcke, was worth it for her. She has built up such massive hatred toward us because we refused to be bullied, that I doubt if she has yet to realize how she was played by Ledcke and/or the [permanent] impact this entire endeavor has had and will have on her. I'd be willing to expect that she will never allow herself to digest the actual reality of her ruin or why we now hold a judgment lien against her.
Image version of judgment lien against pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen for her vexatious conduct.



So, Who Was Arden_1?
(Post-Final Judgment Posting)
Topix poster Arden_1 was actually Suzanne Rossignol, a young woman from Lake City, Florida. I found this out
early in the case in 2009 through a simple method of Googling her Topix screen name, finding her email, and doing a search on Facebook using that email. This was something pro se plaintiff Dolen could have and should have easily done before suing me in Federal court for being this Topix poster, and for this poster's words and actions. It’s called due diligence! This is one more reason why the attack on my family was calculated as nothing but an act of revenge carried out by my husband’s ex’s greedy, scamming, convicted felon friend who had nothing to lose, and what she thought would be everything to gain - Deborah R. Dolen.

After discovering who Arden_1 actually was, I called Suzanne to suggest that she stop acting in such a reckless and irresponsible manner online, and told her that if I was able to find her real identity and contact information so easily, that anyone could. At first she was frightened by my call, but I told her that it was Dolen’s responsibility to discover who she was and assured her that I would not personally volunteer her identity during the case. Her response is something that I still find to be astounding. She told me that she comes from “a good family” and that her actions on Topix would affect that good family’s good standing if they found out how she was behaving. (Apparently, my family was somehow assumed to be inferior, so it was okay for me to take the blame.) Although Dolen did eventually discover Arden_1’s true identity during the case, she was too far into it (and her extortion attempts) to admit it. Arden_1 being someone else wasn’t part of Dolen and Ledcke’s plan. Suzanne never came forward, and let me assume full responsibility, consequence, and the impact for her actions. Thankfully, my family's good name and standing was good enough and strong enough to bear up.

More Case Information:
Citizen Media Law Project: Legal Resources for Citizen Journalists
 

In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. ~ Thomas Jefferson

Disclaimer: This is my own personal blog where I have shared my own personal and direct experience with the individuals named.  There has been no guessing or assumptions made as to who these individuals are.  Any opinions expressed here are also my own, and are based solely and directly as a consequence of the adverse and personal experience(s) with these individuals. 


Related Blogs:
How is This NOT Elder Abuse?
Angela Ledcke Conspires with Felon
Bullies, Psychos, and Internet Trolls
Deborah Dolen, Bully
Special Thanks
Cyberstalker Pretends to Be the Victim

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal Record for Deborah R. Dolen aka Deborah R. Harvey, 1984 to present.

Re: Deborah Dolen Paralink Scam: "Court Orders Sarasota-based Companies to Halt Sales of Work-at-home Business Opportunity Following FTC Charges" (FTC Article ) Federal Trade Commission 2000
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/10/paralink.shtm

"Shady Company Founder Back at Work" (Online Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 2000

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=nUEgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=SX8EAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20dolen&pg=6652%2C5160381

"Woman Who Ran Charity is Convicted of Racketeering" (Newspaper Article) St. Petersburg Times 1990
Link to article

"Work at Home Company Closed" "The complaint was filed against AAA, two sister companies and business founder Deborah Dolen, who has admitted to being a prostitute..."
(Online Newspaper Article) St. Pete Times, Oct 24, 2000

Link to article

Paralegal Kit Marketer Snubs Court, FTC says (Online newspaper article) St. Petersburg Times Nov 10, 2000
"Deceptive trade practices - Link to article

Re; Deborah Dolen (as Deborah Harvey) "Deborah Harvey is Accused of Running a Fraudulent Charity" (Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1989 - http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=m-obAAAAIBAJ&sjid=lnoEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3057%2C1674099

Re; Deborah Dolen (as Deborah Harvey) "Fund Raisers May Be Ignorant of Scam" (Newspaper Article) The News and Courier 1989
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=WgscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aXsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=5154%2C346966

Re; Deborah Dolen (as Deborah Harvey) "Sarasota Woman Convicted in Spina Bifiida Charity Case" (Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1990
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_LUcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=23kEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20harvey&pg=3902%2C485648

Re; Deborah Dolen (as Deborah Harvey) "Harvey to Face Another Racketeering Charge" (Newspaper Article) 1990
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_bUcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=23kEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20harvey%20prostitute&pg=6895%2C1702713

"Attorney Seeks Release From Defending Fraud Suspect" (Newspaper Article) Sarasota-Herald Tribune 1990
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=iK4cAAAAIBAJ&sjid=e3oEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute%20sarasota%20herald&pg=6790%2C1558130

Re: Deborah Dolen (as Deborah Harvey) "Ex-Prostitute Blasts Prosecutors" (Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=97gcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=znsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20harvey%20prostitute&pg=3425%2C2092457

RE: Credit Card Fraud "Escort Service Clients Testify Extra Charges Put on Credit Cards" (Newspaper Article Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992 - http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=WgscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aXsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=5154%2C346966

Re; Deborah Dolen (as Deborah Harvey) - "Harvey Goes on Trial Today" (Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=17kcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=dHsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=4964%2C5452418

"Spina Bifida Charity Battling Birth Defect, Notorious Legacy - The charity must overcome the reputation of a woman who took money raised by her spina bifida prganization." (Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GSghAAAAIBAJ&sjid=1nsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20spina%20bifida&pg=3116%2C3964785

"Fund Raisers May Be Ignorant of Scam" (Newspaper Article) The News and Courier 1989
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=W25JAAAAIBAJ&sjid=AQsNAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=5738%2C811313

"Paralegal Kit Company Investigated - The Sarasota firm and its owner are accuse of fraud..." (Newspaper Article) Lakeland Ledger 2000  http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=vctOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XP0DAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20spina%20bifida&pg=6541%2C4286617

"Federal court halts alleged home based business op scammers." (Para-Link International) (Brief Article).  FTC: Watch. 2000. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-77013763/federal-court-halts-alleged.html

Manatee County Clerk: http://www.clerkofcircuitcourt.com/Chips/OfficialRecords/search.aspx

Sarasota County Clerk Criminal Case Details: http://courtweb.co.sarasota.fl.us/crimapp/crimdetail.asp?case_id=29651085

 

 

 

 

Home  |  About Joanne  |  Archives  |  Just For Fun |  Random |  Contact

joomla visitor
  Copyright Joanne Kidd 2009 - 2013 - All Rights Reserved
Tiny Little Mouse Print:  Please do not reprint/repost my writing or use my photos without my written permission.