|
Deborah Dolen's Lawsuit Scam:
How and Why Deborah R. Dolen aka "Author" Mabel White
Targeted My Family Pro se
In a
Lawsuit Scam, and the Ugly
Truth About Her Frivolous,
Malicious,
and
Vexatious
Abuse of Process.
by
Joanne Kidd, Jacksonville
Jump to
The Federal Court's Final Rulings
and DISMISSAL of her nonsensical claims against us.
Jump to
The Federal Court's FINAL Judgment
FOR Defendants and AGAINST Deborah Dolen.
Our courts are intended to be used for actual victims
seeking justice, not for greedy individuals seeking riches
by playing "lawsuit lottery" with false victimization
claims and stalking through the courts.
We’d never heard of this
individual before she barged into our lives with her
vexatious extortion lawsuit scam, but it didn’t take long to
realize that we were dealing with the Queen of Crazyville--and before long we were to encounter a few
of her village idiots.
Deborah R. Dolen
claims she was a victim of cyberbullying. She has also claimed she
was a victim of "stalking" and that she is a new advocate against it. She has promoted
many false
nonsensical victimization claims, but they were all part of
her plan to
game the legal system (pro se) while disparaging, libeling, and
labeling us as her
"defendants," and her "tormentors." Why? Simply to try and force
us into to paying her to stop because we had become
her latest scam endeavor. She openly held over our heads that she
would ruin our reputations with her lies and continue with her nonsensical
pro se lawsuit against us if we did not pay her to go away. We stood our ground and refused to be
extorted or affected by this woman and her
maliciousness--because as with any lawsuit, there comes a
time when the plaintiff has to "put up or shut up."
In
the end, Deborah Dolen
could not and did not provide a scintilla of evidence to substantiate ANY
of her outrageous claims. The only evidence she provided was that
it was her own conduct that fell under the definition
of being a stalker, cyberpath, and a bully, and in reality - just like a
textbook case of false victimization,
everything she falsely claimed we were doing to her was exactly
what she was doing to us. Here's the ugly truth about her
bullying, her game of pro se lawsuit lottery, her fictional
claims, her delusions, her lies, and her motive.
January
2009:
In late 2008, on a Topix forum where
Deborah Dolen had been boasting and self proclaiming herself
to be a "famous
author," forum participants Googled her name and discovered her
criminal history. They then outted her on that forum as
being a former prostitute and
convicted felon. They posted links to newspaper articles
written about
her, and from there, things apparently got ugly because
Dolen began denying her documented history. One of these posters,
(Arden_1) had
an
IP location as being in the same [very large] city
where my family and I live. At some point in time, Deborah Dolen
and my husband's disturbed ex
Angela Schubart Ledcke
had made contact and become friends. Probably because they
had both been featured on a website about scammers. The
revenge-seeking ex convinced Dolen that my
mother, my husband, and I were these Topix posters, and she
provided Dolen with our names and personal information. She
baited and manipulated Dolen into doing some dirty work of
*revenge
for her by telling Deborah Dolen that we had lots of money.
Prior to us even knowing that Deborah Dolen existed, but after Dolen had
briefly researched (stalked) us and our assets (as she has admitted
doing ), she and
Ledcke devised
a plan to have my husband and me named in a bogus lawsuit--simply
to try and harass us and force us into a monetary settlement. For an added act of malice, Angela Ledcke also provided
Dolen with my elderly mother's name, and she was
included in
the lawsuit. According to later
statements by Angela Schubart Ledcke (my husband's ex, and
Dolen's
partner in this endeavor), Dolen promised Ledcke that she
would do her dirty work and "get them" (us) for her. *Ledcke
had lost custody of a 17 1/2 year old daughter to my husband
a few years prior and was denied any visitation (which clearly speaks for
itself). She had been obsessed with trying to get even with us and
constantly trying to interject herself into our lives and cause
problems. This endeavor must've seemed perfect for her
ultimate revenge.
Wonder what was going on? Okay, I’ll tell you in a
little more detail….
In this time of a down-turned economy,
many businesses are suffering. Sales are down, people aren't
spending like they had been, and small businesses are taking
a hit--especially home-based businesses, I would
imagine. One home-based business owner was attempting a new
way to supplement her income. It seems she decided to sue
unsuspecting people and play a pro se lawsuit lottery game
within our legal system. To most, this type of lawsuit abuse
would not be an option. To one individual who had vast
experience in the court because of her own experiences and
felony record, the plan was to pick our pockets through the
Federal court by gaming the system and
filing an unfounded pro se lawsuit while
simultaneously filing for bankruptcy and naming us as creditors.
In mid January of 2009, convicted felon / paralegal / pro se
plaintiff
Deborah R. Dolen called my [then] 84 year-old mother on the
phone. She introduced herself and began to explain to my
mother how people were picking on her in an online forum and
calling her ugly names.
She went on to say how she was a famous author (Mabel White)
and how she didn't deserve that. My mother had no clue who
this woman was or what
she was talking about, so when Dolen began to ask my mother personal questions, my
mother told her that she did not know who she was and that
she was not interested. At this point Deborah Dolen began a
verbal assault and
threatened my 85 year old mother by telling her that
she
had "better be interested" because she was going to be "sued
in Federal Court, lose everything she owned, and be thrown out in the streets."
Soon thereafter, Deborah R. Dolen aka Mabel White did file a
baseless Federal Lawsuit
against my mother, my husband and me. Her complaint and
"Federal lawsuit" was nothing more than an narration,
deficient of any support, that was based solely on her own
delusions. In fact,
despite the fact that my mother had no internet access,
computer, means or ability to use the internet,
this bogus and fantasy lawsuit named my elderly mother as a "Jane Doe Cyberstalker" and accused
her of cyberstalking, internet
fraud, conspiracy, and even trademark infringement. For
shock value and leverage for what would become a continued
attempt at extorting money from us, Dolen was demanding a
five year prison sentence for all of us - including my
elderly mother! (Being pro se, Dolen obviously did not know
that she couldn't make criminal claims against us.) In this game of lawsuit
lottery, Dolen named all of us as "known cyberstalkers" and
was demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages -
falsely identifying us as the posters on Topix and making
all sort of bizarre and irrational claims against us. After
filing her Federal lawsuit, her first demand for money was
immediate, and she said that if we paid her $10,000 she
would drop the lawsuit against us. We refused.
Although
we had never heard of her or her "author" alias of Mabel
White prior to being targeted and harassed by her, and
although plaintiff / debtor, Deborah R. Dolen admitted that she has had no
prior business or other dealings with any of us,
obviously thinking she was being cunning, after filing a
nonsensical pro se lawsuit against us where she was demanding close to a
million dollars in damages, and prior to having us
served, Dolen filed for bankruptcy (writing off close to a
million dollars in unsecured bad debt) and listed each of us individually
as creditors (for the amount of $1.00). Then, after
she filed for bankruptcy, she served us with the Federal
complaint. Why?
Because, as she boasted, she thought she could sue us and we could not file an
answer or counter-sue her for her devious actions against us
because she would be under the "protection" of the
bankruptcy court. If we (the
defendants) didn't answer the lawsuit because of being named
creditors, the plaintiff could potentially receive a default
judgment. If we, the defendants, did answer the Federal
complaint, her attempted intent was to
slap sanctions on us in bankruptcy court. Two courts -
same game. (Sort of ups the odds in the lawsuit
lottery game.) At one point she tried to bargain with
us, and said she would not file for sanctions against us IF
we would pay her a few thousand dollars. (She has actually
made many demands of monetary "solutions" for
dismissing us from her bogus lawsuit against us.) Her
monetary demands ranged from $2,000 each to $10,000, and
ended up escalating to claimed "damages" of $7,000,000.
This was a person, who
from her own bankruptcy affidavit,
swore under penalty of perjury in Bankruptcy court that she only
made on the average $11,000 a year in income from her
claimed "fame" for the prior three consecutive years.
This filing reflected that her annual income actually
increased from $10,000 to $13,000, and yet at the
same time she was swearing (under penalty of perjury) in her
complaint against us in Federal Court
that we caused her over $75,000 in lost income from the past
year. (That amount of a $75,000 loss is the ticket to be
able to file a complaint in "Federal" court.) A bold lie from
Dolen? Absolutely! She banks on the court's right hand
never knowing what the left hand is doing! (And
surprisingly, they don't!) She is confident that she can exploit the flaws in
our system. (And she did!)
We answered with
counterclaims, and
Dolen immediately threatened
to have us sanctioned, claiming that she was under the
protection of her Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Eventually, the
bankruptcy Judge informed her that from the date she filed
her bankruptcy she was
not protected from her actions
against us, but would be liable for those actions. After
reading the case, he further cautioned her in proceeding
with her claims against us, and clearly stated that
the purpose of his court was not to "protect" her from
her actions or the liability resulting from them. What did debtor Dolen hear him say? Somehow, she interpreted and boasted
in many delusional statements and additional filings that 'she won, we lost’
and that the Judge had "barred" our counterclaims. Go
figure!
Deborah Dolen went on to make her claims against us public.
She posted false and libelous commentary about us on
websites, in forums, and
self-published press releases. She has named us individually as "known cyberstalkers"
and claimed we wanted to
obtain notoriety and some sort of "power" by associating
ourselves with her self-proclaimed "famous author" name of Mabel White.
She fabricated claims that we had other victims and had
"stalked" her. She fabricated claims that we had committed all sorts of internet fraud, trademark
infringement, criminal acts against her - and more. At
one point, she even published online a self-written and fake court
order against us. Every claim, every allegation, and in fact, the entire "Federal
lawsuit" was based solely on false pretenses, and was a wild display of grandiose and
persecutory
delusions, reckless irresponsibility, intentional lies, and
a vexatious attempt to libel and disparage us, then demand
money from us to stop.
So, why did Deborah Dolen
target us for her lawsuit?
From what I have learned about and read from this plaintiff since January of 2009,
I think this came about because of some sort of grandiose/hero complex
she may have. According to my husband's ex,
Angela
Schubart Ledcke,
as mentioned previously, Dolen had contacted and befriended her because they were
both featured on the same online scammer site. Ledcke dangled my
family like a carrot in front of someone who was greedy
enough to forget logic and reasoning, and set her sights in
rolling the dice and
playing a game of pro se lawsuit lottery. There was no
other way on earth for Deborah Dolen to know who we were, know our names, emails, and/or
our personal information without the rants of her new friend
and my husband’s
longtime bothersome ex, Angela Schubart Ledcke. Although Ledcke
eventually confessed to supplying this pro se plaintiff with our names,
Dolen's
original claim was that our attorney had “dimed us out” and
supplied her with our names and information. The only
little
logistical
problem with that was that
Dolen and Ledcke were
trashing us on an that Topix forum days prior to us knowing
anything about Dolen and even before our attorney
knew who we were.
Deborah Dolen's bullying wasn't exclusive to us. She threatened our
attorney with a bar complaint if he did not do what she
demanded! She took it to the next level and
actually filed a delusion and fantasy-filled Texas Bar Complaint against
him, stating
under oath that he was the one who initiated her claims
against us by prodding her to sue us. Her next step was to post her "testimony" and this bar complaint on the same website as
the fake court order against us, and then trash-talk, lie
about, and libel our attorney
continuously in public forums - eventually to
the point to where our attorney was forced to file his own
Complaint Against Deborah Dolen
for
torts, injury, assault, libel, and slander.
More about this pro se plaintiff:
Although it has been defined as "stalking" by this
deluded plaintiff, I discovered while trying to figure out
just who this deranged-acting nut was who had targeted and
was suing, harassing, threatening and disparaging my family, that Deborah R. Dolen (aka Deborah Ruth Harvey,
Deborah R. Graves, Deborah R. Avramidis, Deborah Ruth Avamidis),
has an extensive arrest, criminal, and felony
record! According to her
FDLE
Report
and court records in
various Florida
counties, she has been arrested for everything from
prostitution procurement, solicitation of arson, pandering, forgery,
credit card factoring, probation violation, Rico
violations, money laundering,
racketeering and
grand theft, and much more. Deborah Dolen
was
one of several defendants in a consumer fraud action filed
by the Federal Trade Commission, and the FTC named her as one of the
Top 10
"Dot Con" scams
(
more info).
As Deborah Harvey, she was once even
captured as a fugitive, tried and convicted of racketeering in a
children’s
Spina Bifida charity scam,
and sentenced to a seven year prison term. It appears that
while In prison, this pro se plaintiff obtained a paralegal
certificate (via correspondence classes) and this may be
where her illusions of being an actual attorney began.
(I think this may also be where she learned and practiced
the language she uses to attempt to intimidate others with
her threats and legal-bully-talk, which I personally refer
to as monkey-mouth-cell-gangster talk.
This pro se litigant, as Deborah R. Harvey, had once been
previously determined incompetent to represent herself pro
se in Florida court during an appeals trial after being
found guilty of felony charges.
In one instance, I discovered that
she had tried this bullying 'I’m going to sue you'
tactic before by claiming she had the exclusive trademark
for the term "soy wax." In that instance, she went so far as to pretend
in a letter to be
“legal counsel” (as D. R. Dolen) for Mabel White and another
inexistent "partner" (aka alias) in order to threaten and intimidate candle makers. She
claimed she would haul "violators" into Federal Court
in Tampa if they used the term "soywax," but she offered to sell them
permission to use the term. Now THAT, in my opinion,
is just not normal! Anyway, being a convicted felon, no
wonder she changed her name to Mabel White.
Sounds pure and clean, doesn’t it?
It seems that even "Mabel White" could not live up to honest
standards, and although Dolen claims the name to be “good,”
Mabel White Home Living has received numerous complaints
over the years through the Better Business Bureau and has been the subject of
several online scammer sites, reports, and consumer forums,
and the defendant in at least one small claims lawsuit from
Fed Ex. These
complaints and concerns date back throughout the past half a
dozen years, but Dolen has now claimed that even the
complaints that are from 2002 through 2007 for Mabel White
Home Living (MWHL) have come from me and my family--regardless of the basic fact that we would have had no
motive, had no prior business dealings with her, and didn’t
even know (or care) that she existed until January of 2009 when she began
to harass us! Dolen,
AS "Mabel White" has even posted
rebuttals to many of these aged complaints against her
business of Mabel White Home Living, and although they are
years old she has publicly named and accused my husband,
my 85-year-old mother (who doesn’t own or know how to
use a computer), and me for submitting them. On the site RipOffReport.com,
only moments after she emailed our attorney stating that
whatever is posted on that site never comes down, as a
rebuttal to a complaint from 2007, using her "trade name" of
"Mabel White," Dolen posted all of our names along
with her delusional accusations about us.
Of course
it’s just my opinion, but I would never do business with
someone who demonstrates such unprofessional, unbalanced, and disturbing behavior. But then again,
I have no interest in homemade lotions, potions, perfumes,
candy or coffee flavor oils - and
would never purchased
from a business that was not
licensed, reputable, and/or have FDA approval on their
products. After all, these bathroom-chemist type
businesses can too easily substitute canola oil as cheap
fillers for essential oils, for example.
Why am I being so tacky and
blogging about this?
No, it isn’t like me, but because my family and I have been
inconvenienced for the past several years by having our names associated with this convicted felon, I am personally sick of
Deborah Dolen's
lies, threats, dogmatic delusional pro se legal attacks,
constant attempts to libel and disparage us, and demands of
money from us. In my opinion, this woman has obviously
caused her own problems because of the poor and dishonest
choices she has made and continues to make in life, and
neither I nor any member of my family has had anything to do
with her, her history, her problems, her scams, or anything
else she may dream up, claim, and sue us for. As
“famous” as she may think she is, she was (as is)
inconsequential to us, as we had never even heard of
her or her claimed trade name of “Mabel White” (an alias
name she has
used freely and directly to libel and harass us) prior
to her unwarranted attack on us.
What is a clear and undisputable fact in our world is that this plaintiff, prior to anyone in my
family having any
idea that she existed, was conspiring against us,
researching our assets, posting libelous content about us
online, and had already gathered our names, address, phone
numbers, personal emails, work emails, and other personal
information, and yet her claim is that we had been "stalking" her!
Deborah Dolen has since continued to harass my family by publishing
our names and address online, posting distasteful and
delusional online comments and outbursts, complete lies,
libel, libel per se, and has even published a self-authored
fake and unsigned court order against us. Again, go
figure.
I am confident that plaintiff
"Deborah R. Dolen aka
author Mabel
White"
must realize that her fictional claims against us
have no merit whatsoever and were solely based from the
unsupported claims and gossip of her only source, my husband's ex,
Angela Ledcke (who has personally published online that she is
a diagnosed schizophrenic). Whatever delusional
entitlement this person may think she has to be able to pick
someone out of thin air to sue, trash, and harass, and
attempt to extort money from, she needs
to face reality and realize that she made a poor decision
when she attacked my family with her lawsuit lottery game. She doesn’t know any of us well enough to comment on
anything about us, and I daresay if she did, she would be
surprised to discover just who she choose to target. As
well, she certainly doesn’t know us well
enough to lecture us on any of the many matters she has
harassed us with in her numerous emails - some of which she
actually sent via our employer's emails.
Nonetheless, she has continued in her libel campaign and empty,
unsupported, and ridiculous
accusations regarding my family.
I am also convinced that
pride, arrogance, mean-spirited gaming and greed outweighs her ability to recognize reality
and actually admit that she was completely and totally
wrong in the fantasy-filled conclusions, assumptions, and allegations she made against my
family, and in naming us in her nonsensical Federal lawsuit.

Follow-up....
July 5,
2010:
Since writing about my experience in the above content on my blog,
bogus
lawsuit filer/pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen aka author
"Mabel White" has motioned the Federal Court in the middle
district of Florida for injunctive relief to shut down my
entire blog, and she has continued to demand money from us. Although that motion was filled with more lies, complete delusions, and whatever
fantasies filled her head at the time of filing, the motion
was denied. After the Court ordered her to amend her
Federal complaint, she made a few more attempts at making
demands from us, and even though we ignored her, she
eventually dropped my family from her newest amended bogus
Federal complaint. We stood up to this vexatious
lawsuit bully, and with any luck,
plaintiff Deborah R.
Dolen aka author "Mabel White" will not be able to victimize others with her
vexatious pro se litigation games in the future. Aside
from the fact that she often portrays herself as one of the "rich
and famous," sadly, this person, as we have found through
our personal experience, demonstrates a total lack of
connection with reality, and in our opinion is nothing more than
a bully,
a nut, and a delusional wanna-be seeking attention.
October 21, 2010 - Here We Go
Again...
I am always shocked that there are people who simply do not
recognize the consequences of their own actions. Dolen targeting my family in a
vexatious lawsuit based solely on
greed in order to try and profit from extortion attempts and
also to "get us" for her friend (and my husband's ex), has brought with it
the consequence of me starting this blog. Because she
brought my name online in order to try and trash and damage me in some way, I
felt I had the right to defend my name from her
delusional rants. In reality, this blog never would've
existed, or at least, she never would've been mentioned. After all, without her bullying,
lies, threats, libel, abuse, tirades, and vexatious lawsuit against my family,
obviously I would not have known who she was or anything
about her! (She's not as "famous" in reality as she
seems to be in her own mind.) It's just that simple, yet something
this person does not seem to understand this. Instead, she is
continuing to blame others for her own actions, and
is now throwing a fit in Federal court because I've blogged about our experience of
being the target of her bullying and latest scam attempt.
This pro se
plaintiff
is petitioning the court to amend her lawsuit for
the third time to once again add us back into her "Federal
complaint" of make-believe allegations - simply to
harass us and attempt to restrict me from using her name(s)
and saying on my blog what she has done to us. She seems to
think that I have no right to use the very names that
she, herself has used so freely in her attempts to publicly mock,
disparage, bully, cyberbully, cyberstalk, cyber smear, harass,
threaten, libel, and sue us in bad
faith. As has been her usual pattern,
she is adding new coo-coo concocted theories and fantasy allegations
to her motion to amend. This time, she is claiming and has
submitted an exhibit
in the case that someone called
"the water filer lady" will sign a "formal declaration"
against us
because this "water filter lady" person received an email from someone else. I
don't even know who the heck this "water filter lady" is,
so I can only assume that she is just another nutcase.
In our world, we
have never come across someone that could act so outrageously
irrational and crazy, but I have to admit, Deborah Dolen, as "Mabel White,
CEO" did email us (during the phase of her harassment
campaign where she was emailing us threats via our employers) and warn us that she
"can DO crazy!"
Excerpt from one of her harassing emails to us.
Even after being removed from Dolen's Federal complaint in
June of 2010, in
her attempt to further harass us, in early 2011 Dolen published several
online "articles" that intentionally and falsely stated that
we were still defendants in this case and "going to trial"
as "cyberstalkers" - while publicly gloating because of having associated
our names with such.
With the
exception of one [let's say] "less-than-credible" source, a website owned
by June Maxam,
NorthCountryGazette.org, all other site owners, after
simply reading the irrational and ridiculous article(s), immediately, responsibly, and
respectfully
removed Dolen's bullying libel game from their online
publications. Apparently June Maxam is known for the same
sort of nonsensicality and for imagining herself
to be a "news" correspondent of some sort. Maxam,
ignorantly referencing Dolen's
obsolete
complaint that the court had
previously
dismissed and removed us from as defendants, insists that I did "go to
trial" as a defendant, and that I am "wrong" in
stating that I had not. (Some "reporter" - huh?) (I've discovered that ethics, principles,
and rationality all seem
to run scarce in the world of felons and fruitcakes.) June Maxam, through her webhost, challenged me to sue,
but suing
the insolvent seems like a senseless waste of time.
An Extra Helping of Insanity!
I've personally witnessed more insane
conduct in this one
bogus and vexatious lawsuit filed by pro se plaintiff
Deborah R. Dolen than I think I've seen collective from
anyone in my lifetime. Maybe
that's because by choice, I've never had any association
with this type of unscrupulous person before. Some of the
tactics this plaintiff has used is beyond what anyone with
an ounce of honesty and/or credibility would attempt.
Although she omitted my family from her 2nd amended
complaint and threatened that if we continued with our
counterclaims that she would motion to add us back in, she
actually seems to believe that she can simply invent claims
against us and act as though we were still included in her
bogus lawsuit. In some crazy attempt to try and intimidate
me, Dolen listed my ex husband on her new witness list and
stated that he would testify against my character. When
asked about this, my ex said he had never even heard of
Deborah R. Dolen and that he had no intention of making any
statement or testimony against me. Somehow, in her own
little world, she must've theorized that he would have
something negative to say about me. Dolen actually included
this delusional theory in one of her pleadings and even
intimated that he'd left me in our marriage. As with all of
her assumptions and claims, It doesn't seem to matter to her
that she has absolutely no idea what she's talking about
because she doesn't know anything about us.
Dolen has claimed
over the past two years that we have "confused" the Federal
court Judge in Texas, which resulted in the orders and decisions
made in our favor in this case; that we prejudiced the mediator (and
experienced criminal attorney) against her; that we
"tampered" with the [imaginary] potential jury pool; that I,
personally, "witness tampered," because of my blog; and most
recently, that we "tainted" the Federal Court Magistrate
Judge in Tampa. (All that, and yet I can't even get the
postman to stop walking on my lawn!)

Federal Court Orders and Case Decisions in Dolen v. Ryals,
et al:
February 24, 2011 - Deborah Dolen's Lawsuit and
ALL Claims
Against Us Are Dismissed
For the first day in over two years my family and I are no
longer
being sued and harassed in Federal court by pro se plaintiff
Deborah R. Dolen aka "author" Mabel White in a targeted,
nonsensical, and
fictitious lawsuit lottery game. The Federal court ruled on the
pleadings
and ALL of Deborah Dolen's delusional and bogus claims against my family and me were
DISMISSED with prejudice today in our favor and she is now barred from ever making those
claims against us again.
(Predictably, she somehow thought and immediately boasted in
an email to our attorney that this
decision was in her favor.) As the Federal Court order stated about
claim-thrower Deborah R. Dolen's "tortuous action," "enough is enough."
Order of Dismissal
Our counterclaims were dismissed in that case, but were
dismissed without prejudice, allowing us to reassert them in
a separate action when and where we choose. There wouldn't
be much use for this, however, because Dolen is what the
courts commonly refer to as a
"insolvent defendant." Simply put, she
has nothing.
Deborah Dolen's Lawsuit is DISMISSED at Trial by Federal
Judge:
April 21, 2011 - Julie Ryals Receives a Judgment AGAINST Deborah
R. Dolen
and ALL of Dolen's Claims Are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE!
Deborah Dolen's vexatious and nonsensical lawsuit against Julie Ryals came
to trial before the Federal Court in Tampa, Florida, on April 18, 2011. The issues were
set before a jury. On the third day of the trial, after
Deborah Dolen completed her performance as ringmaster for
her own dog and pony show, in response to a verbal motion by Julie
Ryals' attorney, the
Federal Judge made a decision based on the case presented
and immediately dismissed all of Deborah Dolen's
claims against Julie Ryals WITH PREJUDICE. (Meaning
that Dolen cannot bring those claims again.)
The Federal Judge in Tampa told Dolen that she [quote] did not show even the most minuscule
ounce of proof to her claims. Dolen had said in
published media interviews she had created by interviewing
herself that she would not "fall into the sand trap"
of having to provide proof of her unsupported allegations, but would instead
bring in her own witnesses to simply testify "the old
fashioned way." Because Dolen HAD no proof, but had
been bulldozing through this case with only threats,
bullying, and
bogus accusations, it was no surprise that this desperate plan was actually put into
play. Dolen introduced the
testimonies of Annette Bartowsheski, and Sheryl
Farley (aka Sherry Lynn Farley) of Bradenton, FL - two
anonymous and scripted "witnesses" that Dolen brought in off
the streets to lie and perjure themselves in Federal Court for her
cause. (I have to wonder if they realized while "testifying"
under oath and the penalty of perjury, that there is
indisputable evidence that rebuts what they were scripted
and instructed to
say.) In addition to the scripted "testimony" agenda,
Annette Bartowsheski seemed to be bothered because I did not
publish a negative comment she submitted to my blog, and
she pointed this out to the Federal Judge. (Her comment, by the way, was
the ONLY negative/ugly comment I have ever received, and it was
one that fell into the "irrational" category.)
Bartowsheski also, via her affidavit and testimony, stated
and complained to the Federal court that my blog was
"too long." I suppose I was unaware that this was a Federal
Court-worthy issue or offense, but like I said, "irrational." Sherry Farley was even less rational, and in addition
to her testimony being completely off the wall, she told the court that her
deceased mother spoke to her (by way of a tree falling on her
house), and told her to "help Deborah Dolen."
Despite these witnesses' ridiculous testimonial scripts and transparent attempts to
manufacture the necessary evidence by inventing it on the stand (aka perjury),
the Federal Judge dismissed such foolery and disciplined Dolen by stating
that she had an "infinitesimal-infinity chance of prevailing in this case."
(Direct quote) When Dolen uttered
a confused "a-wha?" the Federal Judge
clarified by saying that Dolen had “a snowball’s chance in
Hell of prevailing on ANY claims made against Mrs. Ryals.”
(Another direct quote)
He further instructed pro se plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen aka
Mabel White that she is forbidden from
ever bringing any claims she made or could have made against
Julie Ryals in this case in the future in ANY court,
therefore, dismissing ALL claims against Julie Ryals by Deborah Dolen WITH
PREJUDICE!
Pending was Julie
Ryals' counterclaim of cybersquatting for the domain
julieryals.com, which Dolen had originally purchased at the
onset of this "lawsuit" endeavor
to use
as a tool for libeling, name-calling, and attempt to
extort a cash settlement in the case. Dolen kept this domain
for 26 months, until eventually abandoning the domain
and letting it expire - at which time
julieryals.com was recovered by
Julie Ryals. Because this ($12.00) counter claim was at this
point moot,
it was also dismissed.
The Federal Court's Final Decision in Deborah Dolen's
Vexatious Lawsuit:
"IT
IS
ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED that
Judgment is entered
AGAINST Deborah R. Dolen and
FOR Julie Ryals on ALL
Deborah R. Dolen’s claims."
Despite Deborah Dolen's continued delusions of the outcome
of her fictional lawsuit, the orders of the court speak for
themselves.
Defendants' Motion for Fees Against Deborah Dolen
-
Re: Plaintiff Dolen's Bad faith litigation
Order
GRANTING
Defendants' Motion for Fees
AGAINST
plaintiff Deborah R. Dolen, etc.
Deborah Dolen Attempts to Recuse Federal
Magistrate Judge and Fails
Deborah Dolen's Response and Threats via Email
(Including additional excuses. She DID respond, and her
response to the Court was a fireworks finale of crazy! The
"ditching" any fees awarded to us in 56 months threatened by
Dolen in this email was referencing her [calculated]
upcoming bankruptcy in 56 months, when she would be eligible
to file again. )
Florida
Court Finds that Pro se Litigant Deborah Dolen Engaged in
Vexatious Conduct
[Vexatious conduct, as defined by the court, is
conduct that is an
abuse of the judicial process
and serves merely to harass or maliciously
injure another party to the civil action.]
"...the Plaintiff makes several baseless arguments, cites to
inapplicable case law, and most importantly, does not refute
the Defendants’ allegations concerning her alleged vexatious
litigation tactics. After a review of the procedural history
of this case, it is clear that the Plaintiff engaged in
vexatious and unreasonable conduct that multiplied the
proceedings."
(Pages 5 and 6)
[Vexatious conduct, as defined by the court, is
conduct that is an
abuse of the judicial process
and serves merely to harass or maliciously
injure another party to the civil action.]
Deborah Dolen Files Affidavit of Indigency to Proceed in
Appeals Court
Even after all of her claims had been dismissed and
unproven, Dolen continues to make her same unsupported
delusions about us in an application to proceed to the
appeals court and have the fees waived. This Affidavit
for Indigency included a
statement that Dolen owed her witness #2, Sheryl
Farley of Bradenton close to $2,000 for "trial expenses."
Was this a payment for Farley's manufactured testimony?
(When Sheryl Farley wasn't paid this amount Dolen promised,
she placed a lien against the title of Deborah Dolen's
vehicle.)
The Final Judgment For Fees
AGAINST
Plaintiff, Deborah R. Dolen
– March 23, 2012
Although it probably goes without saying, the simple fact that
Deborah Dolen remained pro se throughout the history
of this extortion attempt case is another indication of how
baseless and unfounded her claims were and are. If her
claims had held any merit or truth, contingency attorneys
would’ve been lined up to jump on the case. Instead, they
continued to warn her of her liability in pursuing – as did
the various judges involved.
I have to wonder if the plan to "get" us, coaxed by Dolen's
abettor, Angela Schubart Ledcke, was worth it for her. She
has built up such massive hatred toward us because we
refused to be bullied, that I doubt if she has yet to
realize how she was played by Ledcke and/or the [permanent]
impact this entire endeavor has had and will have on her.
I'd be willing to expect that she will never allow herself
to digest the actual reality of her ruin or why we now hold
a
judgment lien against
her.
Image version of judgment lien against pro se plaintiff
Deborah R. Dolen for her vexatious conduct.

So, Who Was Arden_1?
(Post-Final Judgment Posting)
Topix poster Arden_1 was actually Suzanne Rossignol, a young
woman from Lake City, Florida. I found this out
early in
the case in 2009 through a
simple method of Googling her Topix screen name, finding her
email, and doing a search on Facebook using that email. This
was something pro se plaintiff Dolen could have and
should have easily done before suing me in Federal court for
being this Topix poster, and for this poster's words and actions. It’s called due diligence! This is
one more reason why the attack on my family was calculated
as nothing but an act of revenge
carried out by my husband’s ex’s greedy, scamming, convicted
felon friend who had nothing to lose, and what she thought
would be everything to gain - Deborah R. Dolen.
After discovering who Arden_1 actually
was, I called Suzanne to suggest that she stop acting in such a
reckless and irresponsible manner online, and told her that if I was able to
find her real identity and contact information so easily,
that anyone could. At first she was frightened by my call,
but I
told her that it was Dolen’s responsibility to discover who
she was and assured her that I would not personally
volunteer her identity during the case. Her response is
something that I still find to be astounding. She told me
that she comes from “a good family” and that her
actions on Topix would affect that good family’s good
standing if they found out how she was behaving.
(Apparently, my family was somehow assumed to be inferior,
so it was okay for me to take the blame.) Although Dolen did
eventually discover Arden_1’s true identity during the case,
she was too far into it (and her extortion attempts) to
admit it. Arden_1 being someone else wasn’t part of Dolen
and Ledcke’s plan. Suzanne never came forward, and let me
assume full responsibility, consequence, and the impact for
her actions. Thankfully, my family's good
name and standing was good enough and strong enough to bear up.
More Case Information:

In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of
principle, stand like a rock. ~
Thomas Jefferson
Disclaimer: This is my own personal blog where I have
shared my own personal and direct experience with the
individuals named. There has been no guessing or
assumptions made as to who these individuals are. Any
opinions expressed here are also my own, and are based solely
and directly
as a consequence of the adverse and personal experience(s) with these
individuals.

Related Blogs:
How is This NOT Elder Abuse?
Angela Ledcke Conspires with Felon
Bullies,
Psychos, and Internet Trolls
Deborah Dolen, Bully
Special
Thanks
Cyberstalker Pretends to Be the Victim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References:
Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal Record
for Deborah R. Dolen aka Deborah R. Harvey, 1984 to present.
Re: Deborah Dolen Paralink Scam: "Court
Orders Sarasota-based Companies to Halt Sales of
Work-at-home Business Opportunity Following FTC Charges"
(FTC Article ) Federal Trade Commission 2000
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/10/paralink.shtm
"Shady Company Founder
Back at Work" (Online Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 2000
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=nUEgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=SX8EAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20dolen&pg=6652%2C5160381
"Woman Who Ran Charity
is Convicted of Racketeering" (Newspaper Article) St. Petersburg Times
1990
Link to article
"Work
at Home Company Closed" "The complaint was filed against
AAA, two sister companies and business founder Deborah
Dolen, who has admitted to being a prostitute..."
(Online Newspaper Article) St. Pete Times, Oct 24, 2000
Link to article
Paralegal Kit Marketer Snubs Court, FTC says
(Online newspaper article)
St. Petersburg Times
Nov 10, 2000
"Deceptive trade practices -
Link to article
Re; Deborah Dolen (as
Deborah Harvey) "Deborah Harvey is
Accused of Running a Fraudulent Charity" (Article) Sarasota
Herald Tribune 1989 -
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=m-obAAAAIBAJ&sjid=lnoEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3057%2C1674099
Re; Deborah Dolen (as
Deborah Harvey) "Fund Raisers May Be
Ignorant of Scam" (Newspaper Article) The News and
Courier 1989
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=WgscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aXsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=5154%2C346966
Re; Deborah Dolen (as
Deborah Harvey) "Sarasota Woman
Convicted in Spina Bifiida Charity Case" (Newspaper Article) Sarasota
Herald Tribune 1990
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_LUcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=23kEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20harvey&pg=3902%2C485648
Re; Deborah Dolen (as
Deborah Harvey) "Harvey to Face Another Racketeering
Charge" (Newspaper Article) 1990
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_bUcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=23kEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20harvey%20prostitute&pg=6895%2C1702713
"Attorney
Seeks Release From Defending Fraud Suspect" (Newspaper
Article) Sarasota-Herald Tribune 1990
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=iK4cAAAAIBAJ&sjid=e3oEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute%20sarasota%20herald&pg=6790%2C1558130
Re: Deborah Dolen (as
Deborah Harvey) "Ex-Prostitute Blasts Prosecutors"
(Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=97gcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=znsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah%20harvey%20prostitute&pg=3425%2C2092457
RE: Credit Card Fraud "Escort Service Clients Testify
Extra Charges Put on Credit Cards" (Newspaper Article
Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992 -
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=WgscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aXsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=5154%2C346966
Re; Deborah Dolen (as
Deborah Harvey) - "Harvey Goes on Trial Today" (Newspaper
Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=17kcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=dHsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=4964%2C5452418
"Spina Bifida
Charity Battling Birth Defect, Notorious Legacy - The
charity must overcome the reputation of a woman who took
money raised by her spina bifida prganization."
(Newspaper Article) Sarasota Herald Tribune 1992
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GSghAAAAIBAJ&sjid=1nsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20spina%20bifida&pg=3116%2C3964785
"Fund Raisers May Be Ignorant of Scam" (Newspaper
Article) The News and Courier 1989
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=W25JAAAAIBAJ&sjid=AQsNAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20prostitute&pg=5738%2C811313
"Paralegal Kit Company
Investigated - The Sarasota firm and its owner are accuse of
fraud..." (Newspaper Article) Lakeland Ledger 2000
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=vctOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XP0DAAAAIBAJ&dq=deborah-harvey%20spina%20bifida&pg=6541%2C4286617
"Federal court halts alleged home based business op
scammers." (Para-Link International) (Brief Article). FTC:
Watch. 2000.
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-77013763/federal-court-halts-alleged.html
Manatee County Clerk:
http://www.clerkofcircuitcourt.com/Chips/OfficialRecords/search.aspx
Sarasota County Clerk Criminal Case Details:
http://courtweb.co.sarasota.fl.us/crimapp/crimdetail.asp?case_id=29651085
|
|